Don’t take the 2010 federal estate tax repeal for granted yet, because it not only may be temporary, but may lead to undesirable tax consequences. By now, most of you have probably heard that the federal estate tax and generation-skipping transfer tax was repealed this year. Congress failed to prevent expiration of a key piece of estate tax legislation (the 2001 Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act or the “2001 Act”) before December 31, 2009, which has led to a tenuous and uncertain situation with respect to helping clients further their estate plans, and with respect to the estates of decedents who die this year.
As the law currently stands, the estate of someone who dies in 2010 would not be subject to the federal estate tax. But these assets may not pass to beneficiaries free from any federal tax. Inherited property may lose some tax-benefits because its basis will no longer be “stepped up” as was the case under the now-expired 2001 Act. Instead, these inherited assets will have “carry over” basis, meaning many inherited assets may now be subject to capital gains tax. The law mitigates this to a degree by allowing the estate’s executor to allocate up to $1.3 million in basis increase among the decedent’s assets, and up to $3.0 million in basis increase among assets inherited by the surviving spouse. But above and beyond this provision, the capital gains tax may apply.
Furthermore, this year’s repeal may frustrate a testator’s final wishes. Although a will or trust is drafted for every client’s unique needs, many wills and trusts contain formula clauses pertaining to exemptions. Under ordinary circumstances, these formula clauses benefit an estate because they provide flexibility in the event the government changes the tax exemption limits (as it has several times over the last 10 years). Moreover, the use of formula clauses usually saves time and money. But as a consequence of the 2001 Act’s expiration, formula clauses could fail to work as intended because their language (and interpretation) is tied to the federal estate tax law in many instances. As a result, assets may not pass to the designated beneficiaries as intended by the testator.
So how do you respond to the uncertainty created by the federal estate tax repeal? As in many aspects of life where uncertainty is the norm, you can still exercise certainty of action:
- Stay focused on your long-term wealth preservation goals and revisit your estate planning documents in light of your aims.
- Seek help from your attorney and other professionals to understand whether the change in the estate tax law will impact your plans.
- With professional assistance, reevaluate what corrections or adjustments, if any, may be required to achieve your goals.
- The testator and other concerned parties should consult their attorney about the consequences, if any, of the use of formula clauses in the testator’s will or trust, especially where there is a high probability that the testator may pass away in 2010. Ensuring that the testator’s wishes will be carried out will help bring peace of mind to all concerned parties.
Finally, note that the federal gift tax was not repealed, and continues to be in effect with a $1,000,000 lifetime exemption and a 35% rate.